Causal Flows

Share this post
Confounding Bias
causalflows.substack.com

Confounding Bias

Why is causal inference so hard? What "adjustments" can we make to observational data in order to make it easier?

Ken Acquah
Jun 14, 2020
Comment
Share

In my previous posts, I’ve discussed methodologies for calculating causal effects in scenarios for which we observe an explanatory variable and an outcome variable and wish to quantify a causal relationship. I’ve also discussed how estimates can be biased, as a result of external factors affecting both an explanatory variable and an outcome variable. This bias, called confounding bias, is the main reason why causal inference tasks are so challenging, and for so long, confounding bias has been a significant obstacle to analysts attempts to leverage machine learning techniques for causal inference tasks. In this post, I will formalize our discussion of confounding bias and describe a taxonomy of strategies (front-door and back-door adjustments) for identifying and eliminating it.

Excited to send this one out; once I’ve explained this, I can go more in depth in my discussion of specific estimation and identification methodologies, and can describe how exactly business analysts can use machine learning to understand user behavior from latent observational data.

complex dag backdoor
CommentComment
ShareShare

Create your profile

0 subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)

Skip for now

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.

TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2022 Ken Acquah
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Publish on Substack Get the app
Substack is the home for great writing